The traditional hierarchical response models were developed through the years to depict the stages consumers/customers go through, as they learn about a company’s product or service, before moving to purchase readiness or actual behavior.
Each of these models views that a consumer passes through three stages namely cognitive, affective, and behavioral stages.
Four of the best-known response hierarchy models are shown in the figure
Source: Advertising & Promotion by Belch & Belch
These models are discussed giving attention to their origin and implications and include:
See: The Promotional Mix
The AIDA Model
Attention -> interest -> desire -> action
AIDA model depicts the stages in the personal selling process
The Hierarchy-of-Effects Model
Awareness -> Knowledge -> Liking -> Preference -> Conviction -> Purchase
Hierarchy of effects model shows the process by which advertising works
The Innovation-Adoption Model
Awareness -> Interest -> Evaluation -> Trial -> Adoption
Innovation adoption model shows the stages a consumer passes through in the process of adopting a new product
The Information-Processing Model
Presentation -> attention -> comprehension -> yielding -> retention -> behavior
Information processing model a model of the process through which a consumer must pass to be influenced by advertising
See: Basic Model of Communication
Implications of the traditional hierarchy models
The hierarchy models are useful to promotional planners from several perspectives. They delineate the series of steps or stages potential purchasers often must be taken through to move them from a state of no or little awareness to the point where they are ready to purchase.
The hierarchy models can also be useful as “intermediate” measures of communication effectiveness. Knowing where potential buyers are with respect to the various stages of the hierarchy helps the marketers know the specific communication task that must be performed.
Evaluating traditional response hierarchy models
All four of these models view the response process as consisting of movement through a sequence of stages and assume a similar ordering whereby cognitive development precedes affective reaction which in turn precedes behavior.
While this is a logical progression that may be accurate in many situations, the response sequence may not always operate this way. Thus, attention needs to be given to alternative orderings of the response hierarchy.
[…] See: Traditional Response Hierarchy Models […]